Manifesto for Human(e) Leadership

At a time when it is “nor­mal that many things are chang­ing and are chang­ing more quick­ly than ever” (Karl-Heinz Geißler), the role of lead­er­ship must at least be dis­cussed and in parts even ques­tioned. Today Lead­er­ship is only legit­i­mate if it has the self-lead­er­ship of the employ­ees entrust­ed to it as its goal. Lead­er­ship is about mak­ing oth­ers suc­cess­ful. This human lead­er­ship is not a ques­tion of posi­tion, but of atti­tude. In this man­i­festo we describe this atti­tude and the val­ues of a new, agile, dig­i­tal, and above all human lead­er­ship.

Of course, I can­not say whether it will be bet­ter if it will be dif­fer­ent; but I can say that, it must be dif­fer­ent if it is to be good.
Georg Christoph Licht­en­berg

This man­i­festo was the first attempt to answer the ques­tion of lead­er­ship in the con­text of the agile trans­for­ma­tion. How­ev­er, this jour­ney towards more agili­ty and self-orga­ni­za­tion in the face of VUCA, dig­i­ti­za­tion and dis­rup­tion is only the wel­come oppor­tu­ni­ty to revive long-stand­ing con­cepts such as ser­vant lead­er­ship. The man­i­festo is based on the Peter F. Drucker’s research on knowl­edge work and the lead­er­ship of knowl­edge work­ers, as well as on the pos­i­tive con­cep­tion of mankind of the the­o­ry Y from Dou­glas McGregor’s pio­neer­ing book “The Human Side of Enter­prise”. In this sense, the title of the man­i­festo may be under­stood as an allu­sion to this book.

Manifesto for Human(e) Leadership

We believe in the cre­ativ­i­ty and moti­va­tion of human beings. We con­sid­er human lead­er­ship as piv­otal in a high­ly net­worked and high­ly com­plex world. We under­stand the task of lead­er­ship as serv­ing life and striv­ing for con­di­tions in which peo­ple, in their diver­si­ty, can con­tribute in the best pos­si­ble way and in which they can devel­op them­selves and work effec­tive­ly togeth­er. These val­ues are impor­tant to us:

Unleash­ing human poten­tial
over employ­ing human resources. (Read more)

Diver­si­ty and dis­sent
over con­for­mi­ty and con­sen­sus. (Read more)

Pur­pose and trust
over com­mand and con­trol. (Read more)

Con­tri­bu­tions to net­works
over posi­tion in hier­ar­chies. (Read more)

Grow­ing lead­ers
over lead­ing fol­low­ers. (Read more)

Coura­geous­ly explor­ing the new
over effi­cient­ly exploit­ing the old. (Read more)

That is, while there is val­ue in the items on the bot­tom, we val­ue the high­light­ed items on the top more.

There is also a print­able ver­sion of this Man­i­festo for Human(e) Lead­er­ship.

Sign the Manifesto

Sign the Manifesto for Human Leadership

  1. Unleash­ing human poten­tial over employ­ing human ressources.
  2. Embrac­ing diver­si­ty and dis­sent over seek­ing con­for­mi­ty and con­sen­sus.
  3. Pur­pose and trust over com­mand and con­trol.
  4. Con­tri­bu­tions to net­works over posi­tion in hier­ar­chies.
  5. Cre­at­ing lead­ers over lead­ing fol­low­ers.
  6. Coura­geous­ly explor­ing the new over effi­cient­ly exploit­ing the old.

**your sig­na­ture**

Share this with your friends:

   

Dis­claimer: Your per­son­al data and espe­cial­ly your e‑mail address will be stored by sign­ing this man­i­festo. For detailed infor­ma­tion have a look at our pri­va­cy pol­i­cy. Please con­sid­er sub­scrib­ing to our Newslet­ter to stay informed about the man­i­festo and the lat­est posts here.

Latest Signatures

Lat­est Sig­na­tures
902Dieter Kaufhold
901Walde­mar Kuznik
900Sabine Bergmann
899Mar­tin Kom­pan
898Hen­drik Epe
897Marc-Dino Krause
896Thomas Brösam­le
895Uli Thoma­le
894Klaus Dut­ten­höfer
893Beate Win­ter
892Dörte Deniz
891LUIS MANUEL MARTINEZ
890Richard Weller
889Car­o­line Ram­pone
888Mar­tin Stein
887Car­los Arturo Quiroga
886Her­nan Dos San­tos
885Jorge Roldan
884Adrián Mauri­cio Hur­ta­do Sánchez
883Diego Sanchez Rivera
882Vitaly Gey­man
881Markus Hes­sel
880Petra Adri­anowytsch
879Alexan­der Thee­garten
878Miryam del Socor­ro Sier­ra Tor­res
877Vera Budzahn-Pörschke
876Juer­gen Flickinger
875Sebas­t­ian Kraus
874Karl Leu
873Michael Kaiser
872Car­men Valero
871Fried­helm Köh­ler
870Susanne Rep­pin
869Daniela Arndt
868Tama­ra Kess
867Rose Mery Restre­po Velez
866Bet­ti­na Stack­el­berg
865Rain­er Engel
864Ste­fan Eich­berg­er
863flo­ri­an wüch­n­er
862Daniel Berndt
861Douriya Bell
860Clau­dia Gruse­mann-Schmidt
859Vítor Oliveira
858Flo­ri­an Mücke
857Anna-Katha­ri­na Glahn
856Hans-Jür­gen Wal­ter
855Rene Längert
854Ans­gar Kemp­kes
853Daniela Schw­erdt­feger
< >

Stay Current!

You nev­er want to miss an arti­cle on my blog again? With our Newslet­ter you will receive the lat­est arti­cles in your inbox once a week.

7 Comments

Great point and well said Mar­cus,
But can you change peo­ple or when you talk about chang­ing the cul­ture of a cor­po­ra­tion or orga­ni­za­tion do you need to change the lead­ers of the hier­ar­chy to change the whole thing?

Thanks Ran­dal! Change is hard and chang­ing oth­ers in my opin­ion impos­si­ble. What I can do and try to do is to inspire peo­ple to think about their behav­ior and the cul­ture they cre­ate with it. To this end, it cer­tain­ly helps to start with lead­er­ship as peo­ple in most orga­ni­za­tions are focused on the behav­ior their lead­ers show.

I find your mate­r­i­al most inter­est­ing and rel­e­vant. Look­ing for­ward to read­ing more of your insights!

Thank you Mar­cus for this point­ed and thought-pro­vok­ing state­ments! It reminds me of the Agile Man­i­festo with its pure­ly pos­i­tive state­ments. For my taste “Com­mand and con­trol” sounds a bit to neg­a­tive to sin­cere­ly val­ue it ;-)

Thank you so much for your appre­ci­a­tion! Indeed, it was meant to resem­ble the Agile Man­i­festo. And it is not so easy to come up with pure­ly pos­i­tive state­ments. And “com­mand & con­trol” indeed is the one where we have the most dis­cus­sion. I agree, that we should try to find a bet­ter and more pos­i­tive terms, e.g. “direc­tion and feed­back”.

Leave a Reply

Related Posts

Leading by Example

Gen­uine author­i­ty is not a ques­tion of rank, but of exem­plary behav­ior, for lead­er­ship is based more on imi­ta­tion than on sub­or­di­na­tion. We could save our­selves a lot of resis­tance,…